36,337 research outputs found

    clcNet: Improving the Efficiency of Convolutional Neural Network using Channel Local Convolutions

    Full text link
    Depthwise convolution and grouped convolution has been successfully applied to improve the efficiency of convolutional neural network (CNN). We suggest that these models can be considered as special cases of a generalized convolution operation, named channel local convolution(CLC), where an output channel is computed using a subset of the input channels. This definition entails computation dependency relations between input and output channels, which can be represented by a channel dependency graph(CDG). By modifying the CDG of grouped convolution, a new CLC kernel named interlaced grouped convolution (IGC) is created. Stacking IGC and GC kernels results in a convolution block (named CLC Block) for approximating regular convolution. By resorting to the CDG as an analysis tool, we derive the rule for setting the meta-parameters of IGC and GC and the framework for minimizing the computational cost. A new CNN model named clcNet is then constructed using CLC blocks, which shows significantly higher computational efficiency and fewer parameters compared to state-of-the-art networks, when being tested using the ImageNet-1K dataset. Source code is available at https://github.com/dqzhang17/clcnet.torch

    The decays B→Ψ(2S)π(K),ηc(2S)π(K)B\to \Psi(2S)\pi(K),\eta_c(2S)\pi(K) in the pQCD approach beyond the leading-order

    Full text link
    Two body BB meson decays involving the radially excited meson ψ(2S)/Ξ·c(2S)\psi(2S)/\eta_c(2S) in the final states are studied by using the perturbative QCD (pQCD) approach. We find that: (a) The branching ratios for the decays involving KK meson are predicted as Br(B+β†’Οˆ(2S)K+)=(5.37βˆ’2.22+1.85)Γ—10βˆ’4,Br(B0β†’Οˆ(2S)K0)=(4.98βˆ’2.06+1.71)Γ—10βˆ’4,Br(B+β†’Ξ·c(2S)K+)=(3.54βˆ’3.09+3.18)Γ—10βˆ’4Br(B^+\to\psi(2S)K^+)=(5.37^{+1.85}_{-2.22})\times10^{-4}, Br(B^0\to\psi(2S)K^0)=(4.98^{+1.71}_{-2.06})\times10^{-4}, Br(B^+\to\eta_c(2S)K^+)=(3.54^{+3.18}_{-3.09})\times10^{-4}, which are consistent well with the present data when including the next-to-leading-order (NLO) effects. Here the NLO effects are from the vertex corrections and the NLO Wilson coefficients. The large errors in the decay B+β†’Ξ·c(2S)K+B^+\to\eta_c(2S)K^+ are mainly induced by using the decay constant fΞ·c(2S)=0.243βˆ’0.111+0.079f_{\eta_c(2S)}=0.243^{+0.079}_{-0.111} GeV with large uncertainties. (b) While there seems to be some room left for other higher order corrections or the non-perturbative long distance contributions in the decays involving Ο€\pi meson, Br(B+β†’Οˆ(2S)Ο€+)=(1.17βˆ’0.50+0.42)Γ—10βˆ’5,Br(B0β†’Οˆ(2S)Ο€0)=0.54βˆ’0.23+0.20Γ—10βˆ’5Br(B^+\to\psi(2S)\pi^+)=(1.17^{+0.42}_{-0.50})\times10^{-5}, Br(B^0\to\psi(2S)\pi^0)=0.54^{+0.20}_{-0.23}\times10^{-5}, which are smaller than the present data. The results for other decays can be tested at the running LHCb and forthcoming Super-B experiments. (c) There is no obvious evidence of the direct CP violation being seen in the decays Bβ†’Οˆ(2S)Ο€(K),Ξ·c(2S)Ο€(K)B\to \psi(2S)\pi(K), \eta_c(2S)\pi(K) in the present experiments, which is supported by our calculations. If a few percent value is confirmed in the future , it would indicate new physics definitely.Comment: 11 pages, 3 figures. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1705.0052
    • …
    corecore